While there have been people for ages theorizing that Jesus was married and had children (some Gnostic gospels (not accepted as inspired or part of the Bible) claimed this and the Merovingians even claimed to be descended from Jesus), the whole Da Vinci Code craze has brought it to mainstream thought. Even though it was written as fiction and is full of research errors, many people take the Da Vinci Code as truth. That topic has been discussed ad nauseum by bloggers, theologians, newspaper reporters, and the general public, mostly being disproven, so I’ll let that lie.
The big news today was that somebody is claiming to have found Jesus’ “real” tomb, complete with tombs of his mother, wife, and at least one child. James Cameron (of Titanic infamy) has produced a documentary movie called The Lost Tomb of Jesus, which accompanies a book called The Jesus Family Tomb. They’re based on the discovery of this tomb that has similar names to people in the life of Jesus. It is quite the controversy and has been discredited by eminent archaeologists, but the contronversy continues.
The claim is based on there being a 2,000-year-old cave with tombs with the names of “Jesus, son of Joseph,” Mary, Mariamne (supposed to be Mary Magdalene), and “Judah, son of Jesus.” They’ve even tried to link this tomb through forensic “evidence” to the one of Jesus’ supposed brother, that turned out to be a fake.
Problem: Jesus, or Yeshua or Joshua, was the 6th most common name in Israel at that time. But “Jesus, son of Joseph” alongside a tomb of someone named Mary is supposed to raise the certainty to near-fact. Except for the actual fact that “Joseph” was the 2nd most common name then and Mary was also one of the most popular girl names. (See Ilan, Tall. (2002). Lexicon of Jewish Names in Late Antiquity: Part I: Palestine 330 BCE-200 CE. Tubingen: Mohr.)
That would be like saying that a grave in England with the name William, son of William, found alongside a grave named Mary conclusively would have to be William of Orange.
The spouse and child information would be relevant IF THERE WERE ANY RECORD OF JESUS BEING A HUSBAND AND FATHER. But there isn’t because he wasn’t and so this movie and book are simply another example of shoddy research attempting to capitalize on the success and popularity of other fictional stories.
Here are some external links of interest:
[tags]Jesus, Talpiot, Da Vinci Code, archaeology[/tags]