‘The Da Vinci Code’ - A Positive for Christianity
Categories: Controversial Topics, Movies & Television, ReligionThis morning I read an article by Father Jonathan Morris that was posted on FoxNews.com. I thought it was insightful and wise. His basic premise was that a book (and movie) that takes aim at many of the basics of Christianity in the guise of “academia” (fiction presented as fact) is actually a good thing for Christianity.
Why?
Because the main reason people can believe so much of the anti-Biblical ideas that Dan Brown has assembled is because so many Christians don’t know their own faith, and are thus easily taken in by logical-sounding “research.”
Ephesians chapter 4 encourages Christians to be mature so that they “will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.” The condemnation of those preaching a false “gospel” is loudly proclaimed in Galations 1:6-9.
Here is a bit of what Father Jonathan wrote, but I strongly encourage you to read his whole article (it’s not THAT long). He gets into more detail and into a couple other related topics. It’s well worth the read!
Dan Brown is capable of passing fiction for fact because Christians don’t know their faith — what and why they believe. That’s not Mr. Brown’s fault.
Admittedly, the bait they take is a good one. Brown writes his truth claim after the title page: “All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals are accurate.” Art and archaeology historians have taken it upon themselves to call him to task for the inaccurate and unprofessional nature of such a claim. Following good advice from his agent and publisher, he has refused to recant, preferring marketing savvy to academic integrity.
In this ambiance of pseudo-historic accuracy, Brown uses his fictional characters to call into question fundamental elements of the Christian faith: 1) the divinity of Christ 2) the validity of the four Gospels 3) the beliefs of the early Christian community.
He does this by claiming the Gospels are part of a conspiracy theory by the apostles to create a male-dominated, patriarchal Church that would stamp out the “sacred feminine.” Brown says Jesus’ true intentions were to leave the Church under the charge of Mary Magdalene, with whom he maintained a romantic relationship. In Brown’s pseudo-religious historical novel, the emperor Constantine seconds the Apostles’ selfish quest for power by outlawing competing gospels to avoid revealing the true story of who Jesus was and what he taught. None of this is true. Let me show you why.
If the Apostles’ intention in writing the Gospels was to produce propaganda pieces to wrest power away from women and take it for themselves, you would expect them to show themselves in the best possible light, reinforce the reader’s bias regarding male superiority, and belittle Mary Magdalene, or keep her out of the story altogether. In fact, the Gospels do just the opposite. They depict the Apostles as men slow to understand, unwilling to suffer, and incapable of loyalty. They do all this while presenting women as their noble antithesis.
Mary Magdalene and Mary, the mother of Jesus, stand out for their moral courage as they accompany Christ to his crucifixion (the apostles had scattered). The Gospel of John highlights Jesus’ “irreverence” to social structures that looked down on public contact with women. The Gospels refer to women as disciples who share in Jesus’ mission. And just in case there were doubts, the writers point out that Jesus appeared first to Mary Magdalene before any of the apostles.
If we are to believe Dan Brown’s fundamental claim that the authors of the Gospels wrote to conspire against Mary Magdalene and women in general, we also must believe they did a very poor job.
Jesus, who claimed to be the divine Son of God, was pro-woman like nobody else in his day, or ours. And that is the story the Gospels tell. Brown’s attempt at reinvigorating radical feminist sentiment by constructing a false male-female conflict is retro and old. Jesus knew a woman’s worth doesn’t come from being better than men, but from who she is on her own two feet — a daughter of God. Her spiritual sensitivity, intuition, nurturing character, and motherhood are beautifully unique.
If the millions of readers and viewers of “The Da Vinci Code” knew the Christian faith, Dan Brown would be unable to muddle fact and fiction in the irresponsible way he has.
CHRISTIANS, study your Bible and know why you believe what you believe! Then you can stand firm and not be easily swayed by every new wind or “finding” that comes along.




Na







