Christian Pluralism?
Categories: Controversial Topics, ReligionThis morning I was listening to NPR on the way to work, like I usually do. They featured a story called “Experiencing Other Faiths to Find Your Own,” about a girl from Davidson College (NC) who took a year to travel abroad and explore other ways of looking at religion.
With a small group of students, Gillian Siple, a religion major, lived in China, Thailand and India. She meditated in monasteries and ashrams, lived and studied among Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus — not your typical study-abroad program.
She remembers living at a meditation center in Thailand, wearing the traditional garb of a yogi. “I remember waking up at 4 o’clock in the morning and taking out my mat and I can remember just thinking, ‘What if my friends saw me now? Would anyone recognize me? I am so far from the person and the life that I live back at Davidson right now. There’s no remnant of that life on my body right now.’”
Even her faith began to fall away. She says that when she mediated, she felt an uncommon sense of peace. She wondered: Have I gone into this too deeply? Am I still a Christian, or am I becoming something else?
She said she now calls herself a “Christian Pluralist,” meaning that she is open to the validity of other religions. I’m sorry, but I don’t think that’s actually possible. A Christian is someone who follows Christ and His teachings. One of those teachings, very clearly put by Him, was that there IS no other way.
- John 14:6 says: “Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’”
- Acts 4:12 says: “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.”
True Christianity has no allowance for other religions being “correct.” Granted, nobody should be forced to believe anything and everyone should be allowed to believe whatever they want and follow whatever religion they choose, but that does not make everyone right. There’s a big difference between allowing everyone to believe what they want and endorsing what everyone believes.
“Christian Pluralism,” then, is really an oxymoron. You can’t have both with integrity; one or the other must be compromised to be held to by one person. From this story, it sounds like Gillian has compromised her Christianity for the sake of Pluralism.
But that’s not really a surprise. When listening to her tell her story, I was struck by the feelings she expressed about when she was on this trip and tried to reconnect to her Christian God. She went into her room and knelt and tried to pray. She got as far as “Dear God…” and no words would come. I think that was when she said she began wondering what she was becoming if she couldn’t pray to this God that she no longer knew.
My thought: If you immerse yourself in error, of COURSE you will lose connection with the Truth. Investigating and learning are good, and learning about other religions can help you appreciate your own faith, but becoming steeped in the ways of error will not help you learn the Truth. Maybe it’s the difference between intellectually learning something and becoming personally involved, making it part of you.
This isn’t a popular concept nowadays, but it needs to be said. People today want to hear that anything is legitimate and valid as long as it is believed with sincerity. It makes people feel better about themselves and it soothes the guilty heart to be told that there are no absolutes. What counts is being nice to people and keeping your religion to yourself. They say there’s no such thing today as being wrong in the area of religion. But true Christianity (and true Islam and several others) teaches that there IS such a thing as right and wrong and that following other religions is error. There is no reconciliation there. Apart from dialogue, whose purpose is basically to encourage civility, but not necessarily acceptance.
My thought: If God came down to earth and told us what was right and wrong and what to believe and how to live, it would become our obligation to follow Him. (And you know what? That HAPPENED!)
Be sure to visit the NPR page itself to read the whole article that prompted this post. You can even click the “Listen” button at the top and hear the story just like it was broadcast this morning.
[tags]religion, Christianity, pluralism, NPR[/tags]




Na








January 12th, 2007 at 10:31
Very interesting post Pfitz. I completely agree with you. This is very rich and I will have to re-read this later on today.
January 12th, 2007 at 10:51
You wrote: ”This isn’t a popular concept nowadays, but it needs to be said. People today want to hear that anything is legitimate and valid as long as it is believed with sincerity … What counts is being nice to people and keeping your religion to yourself.”
This reminded me of something that Pope Benedict XVI said in his most recent Wednesday Audience. Discussing Stephen, the Pope pointed out that Stephen was called to the social ministry of the diaconate, but as we see from his martyrdom, he was also fully capable of preaching the Faith.
Can we just be nice and keep our religion to ourselves? Here’s what the Pope said:
”Stephen’s story tells us much. For example, it teaches us that we must never disassociate the social commitment of charity from the courageous proclamation of the faith. He was one of the seven entrusted above all with charity. But it was not possible to disassociate charity from proclamation. Thus, with charity, he proclaims Christ crucified, to the point of also accepting martyrdom. This is the first lesson that we can learn from the figure of St. Stephen: Charity and proclamation always go together.” (General Audience, Jan. 10, 2007, source)
Food for thought.
January 12th, 2007 at 12:44
A very thought provoking post.
Where to begin with my thoughts? (Don’t base your next doctrinal thesis on this… it’s just my rambling thoughts)
Though I believe entirely that nothing can separate us from the love of God - nothing external that is. We can and certainly do separate ourselves from God when we sin. Are we to expect to remain in Gods fellowship if we set aside “Thou shall have no other gods before me.” for the sake of an educational enlightenment? To learn is good - to know the truth within the falsehood is good too. The best deception contains enough truth to capture credibility. So to study and understand other religions can be of great benifit to Christians.
However, to go so far as to immerse in and experience these false gods and to participate in their worship is a terribly dangerous thing. I would say especially so to those who know and understand the truth.
We are warned in Hebrews against falling away. Those warnings aren’t there to fill paper. There are serious - even eternal consequences in knowing the truth and rejecting it as falsehood.
January 12th, 2007 at 17:39
Out of all the “one true religions”, logically only one can be true.
On this much we agree.
~BCP
January 14th, 2007 at 20:14
Puhlease already. Yeah, one of them could be true or maybe the more logical conclusion, NONE OF THEM ARE TRUE! Are you drinking any of that coffee? Myth based religion is an artifact of humanity’s intellectual infancy. Upgrade your Atari 2600 brain and find some more reality based means of connecting with your potential as a human. You don’t need to believe in a mythological sky god like Zeus or Yahweh or Ahura Mazda or their earthly avatars in order to be a good person. Ms Siple should be applauded for her lack of xenophobia and relative intellectual honesty for adopting a pluralistic view. Why she came back to the sky god cult of her youth is my only question about her story. I wish your God would go ahead and rapture your cromag butts off to Valhallah or whatever already. Get it over with before you act out your sick deluded fantasy of armegeddon and destroy your own species. Guh!
January 14th, 2007 at 21:57
Um… wow! That was constructive.
It’s not like all Christians even believe in the Rapture, let alone Valhalla or “acting out Armageddon.” Your random combination of elements of all kinds of religions demonstrates your lack of understanding of any of them. And insulting the intelligence of someone in a dialogue is the lowest option for someone who has no good arguments left.
Humans are spiritual beings and delving into religion and their relationship with God IS reality based.
Just the same, I’ll pray for you.
January 14th, 2007 at 23:43
I know I’m being rude. There are tons of good arguments but few that someone who has invested in the idea that the Bible is the literal word of Yahweh or perhaps part literal/part interpretive will actually listen to or be convinced by…thus by frustrated impolite rant. And I’m mashing together different religious concepts to make the sarcastic point that they are all of the same nature. Sorry, but the whole christians vs the other christians vs the muslims vs the hindus vs the whatevers is getting old and I’ve grown impatient.
Separate the interface layer from the data layer!
Separate the symbols from the underlying experience of being a human on this weird planet.
You can be ’spiritual’ without clinging to circular religio-logic like ‘the book is true because the book says its true’. I’m all for exploring the worlds religious traditions, world myths, rituals, practices, etc. Just, why why why must we persist in the dogmatic adherence to the dictates of some deity dreamed up by people 2000 years ago? We might as well worship Zeus or Brahma or Mithra or any of the other 10000 comic book character deities in the history books. Myth based religion practiced by persons who do not understand that it is myth based and made by man is tearing this world apart. You can practice the teachings of Jesus if you wish without believing he had magical powers and was born from a virgin.
Anyway, thanks for your prayers. Your focused good intentions will manifest in your deeds which will effect the world you and I both live in and hopefully create some benefit for beings. Right back at you.
January 15th, 2007 at 14:45
My reaction to the NPR broadcast the other day was that Ms. Siple is an example of a person in love with religion but not with Jesus. Loving Jesus results in abandoning other lovers. When one discovers the God of the Bible–Christ–one stops pursuing other religions. Religion seduces but cannot satisfy. The great lesson we learn from the Tanakh, the Old Testament, is the lesson of Israel’s relationship with YHVH and her spiritual adultery in following false gods and engaging in idolatry. The first commandment of the Mosaic Law was “you will have no other gods before me.” This is what YHVH commanded and Jesus also (cf. Jn 14.6). Only YHVH gives life and satisfaction. Other paths are deceptions and hopeless quests.