Abolish Thanksgiving
Categories: Controversial Topics, HolidaysAfter much thought and consideration, I’ve become convinced that it’s not long before Thanksgiving is dropped as a national holiday.
Well, okay, not exactly. Even though many people don’t celebrate Christmas, it’s still considered a national holiday and pretty much everyone gets the day off of work.
But if Thanksgiving isn’t abolished, it will at least be changed in its nature and in how people talk about it. By nature (meaning how it was originally intended and how it still operates), Thanksgiving Day is a day for people to give thanks. Most of the time, it’s not about being thankful for little things like buying lunch or some small gift; it’s being grateful for the “big things,” like family, home, needs being met, that kind of thing.
For people that don’t believe in God, there is a major cognitive dissonance here. Either atheists/agnostics/others are merely “glad” for the things they have, or they’re truly “grateful,” which indicates at least a subconscious admission of belief in God. It’s like after a major hurricane and someone says, “I’m just grateful that we all survived.” Grateful? To whom? Being grateful necessitates a recipient of the gratitude and acknowledges that the recipient gave you something.
I don’t think this is merely a matter of semantics. It’s evidence of how much a belief in God is truly a part of most people’s psyches. And if people are going to vocally deny that, then the very nature of Thanksgiving Day will change, if not be totally done away with. We’ll have to call it Gladness Day or something, since that’s all that people would really be expressing.




Na








November 25th, 2005 at 9:27
I vote semantics and interpreting the historical narrative.
See: http://www.usathanksgiving.com/2005/info/thanksgivinghistory.html
“…that famous dinner, which was shared by 50-odd English immigrants and 90 Wampanoag men led by their sachem Massasoit, was not a real Thanksgiving at all! It was a secular harvest celebration that was not associated with the modern Thanksgiving holiday until the nineteenth century.”
So, I suppose if your at odds with “secularists” celebrating the holiday then frame it for them as a harvest celebration. However, if you are religious go with the Puritian version below.
“The American Thanksgiving has its origin in Puritan New England, where strict Calvinist doctrine sanctioned only the Sabbath, fast days and Thanksgivings as religious holidays. Fasts and Thanksgivings were declared whenever events called for recognition of God’s special Providence, but never on Sunday nor on a fixed date…In 1841, Alexander Young, seeing a similarity between his contemporary American thanksgiving and the secular 1621 harvest festival, declared the Pilgrim event the “First Thanksgiving”.”
I am skeptical that it would ever be abolished. Given that there is much tradition associated with it, and given that our capitalist society has turned Thankgiving (and the day after), into a top 5 retail event, it is here to stay.
BCP who likes Thanksgiving.
November 25th, 2005 at 9:58
Hey, I’m all for Thanksgiving myself. Whether merely celebrating the harvest or actually setting aside a day for giving thanks. But I still hold to the idea that you can’t be THANKFUL for something that wasn’t GIVEN to you. If you’re thankful for your family or your health or whatever, you’re tacitly acknowledging that they were given to you, either by God or my some other supreme Intelligence that has the power to grant health and happiness. It requires a conscious act of giving. Being grateful to “the cosmos” just doesn’t work that way.
November 25th, 2005 at 12:46
Fair enough!
Hmmmm…so can’t be thankful to humanity?
Personally, I hold to the idea of leftover turkey sandwiches and turkey pot pie. Moreover, I am very thankful for the chefs who created the recipies, the fact that we live in a pretty democratic and bountiful society (props to the founders), and the farmers who grew all the stuff.
…and don’t even get me started on pie!
Mmmmmm, pie.
~BCP